AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 21, 2026
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 9, 2026
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 9, 2026
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
96
Introduced by Assembly Member Nguyen
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alanis, Lackey, and Soria)
February 20, 2026
An act to amend Section 3055 Sections 3053.9, 3055, and 5075.6 of the Penal Code, and to amend Section 6601 Sections 6600, 6601, and 6601.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to corrections.
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal committee: yes Local program: yes
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings, among other responsibilities, to conduct parole suitability hearings and determine whether an individual is suitable for parole. Existing law establishes the Elderly Parole Program for the purpose of reviewing parole suitability of inmates who are 50 years of age or older and who have served a minimum of 20 years of continuous incarceration on their sentence. Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings, when considering the release of qualifying inmates, to give special consideration to whether certain criteria have reduced the elderly inmate’s risk for future violence. Existing law excludes various persons from these provisions, including persons sentenced pursuant to existing sentencing provisions commonly known as the 3 strikes law. Under an existing court order, although statutorily excluded, an individual may be eligible for parole under the Elderly Parole Program when they are 60 years of age or older and have been continuously incarcerated for at least 25 years.
This bill would instead specify that persons convicted of various sexual offenses, including rape, sodomy, or aggravated sexual assault of a child, or sentenced pursuant to a provision applicable where the crimes involved had multiple victims, as specified, are not suitable eligible for parole under the Elderly Parole Program, unless the person is 65 years of age or older and has served a minimum of 25 years of continuous incarceration on their current sentence.
The bill would require the board to review a sexual dangerousness screening of an individual sentenced to an indeterminate sentence for a sexually violent offense, as defined, and would require the board to refer a person whose sexual dangerousness screening indicates that they may qualify as a sexually violent predator to the State Department of State Hospitals for further evaluation, as described. The bill would require commissioners who conduct hearings to undergo training in sex offender behaviors and risks.
Existing law defines a sexually violent predator to mean a person who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense against one or more victims and who has a diagnosed mental disorder that makes the person a danger to the health and safety of others in that it is likely that the person will engage in sexually violent criminal behavior. For purposes of this definition, a conviction for a sexually violent offense includes convictions that resulted in either a determinate or an indeterminate prison sentence, as specified. Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to refer a person who is in custody under that department’s jurisdiction, and who is serving a determinate sentence or whose parole has been revoked, for evaluation by the State Department of State Hospitals at least 6 months prior to that individual’s scheduled date for release from prison if the secretary determines that the person may be a sexually violent predator. Existing law requires a petition for commitment as a sexually violent predator to be filed in the county in which the person was convicted of the sexual offense for which the person was committed to the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
This bill would also require the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings to make that referral and revise the criteria for referral to additionally apply to a person who is serving an indeterminate prison sentence. The bill would also authorize the secretary, or the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings, to refer the person for evaluation if the person’s scheduled release date is less than 4 months after the date of the decision to grant parole, or if the person will be scheduled for a parole hearing in the next 6 months. By imposing additional duties on counties regarding commitment of persons as sexually violent predators, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 3053.9 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
3053.9.
(a) If an inmate incarcerated person has a prior conviction for a sexually violent offense, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6600 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, the board shall consider the results of a comprehensive risk assessment for sex offenders in considering parole.
(b) (1) Before the board meets to review or consider the parole suitability of an incarcerated person sentenced to an indeterminate sentence for a sexually violent offense, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6600 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, the board shall review a sexual dangerousness screening to determine if a person is likely to be a sexually violent predator. The screening shall be conducted by a licensed psychologist.
(2) Individuals may be referred to the State Department of State Hospitals after the initial screening, under certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(A) The evaluator opinions that the individual has either of the following:
(i) A complex sexual violence risk.
(ii) An equivocal predatory element to their sexual violence risk.
(B) The individual has complex sexually violent predator relevant diagnoses linked to criminal sexual offending.
(C) The person has received sex offender-specific treatment or interventions, and in the professional opinion of the evaluator performing the sexual dangerousness screening, it is unclear if the screening adequately addresses the individual’s risk factors.
(D) Other complex cases as requested by the Board of Parole Hearings and approved by the Director of State Hospitals or a designee.
(c) The board shall consider the results of the sexual dangerousness screening or screenings in determining if an individual is suitable for parole.
(d) If the board grants parole to an individual whose sexual dangerousness screening indicates they may qualify as a sexually violent predator, they shall immediately be referred to the State Department of State Hospitals for a sexually violent predator evaluation pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 6600) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(e) (1) The sexual dangerousness screening shall be jointly created by the board and the State Department of State Hospitals. The screening shall be a review that considers the incarcerated person’s sexual dangerousness, informed by the Sexually Violent Predators Act as described in Article 4 (commencing with Section 6600) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The screening shall include, but is not limited to, both of the following factors:
(A) The victim demographics and selection, and the nature of the violence perpetrated against the victim or victims, and persistence of offending.
(B) Evidence of sexual deviance, as demonstrated by objective indicators.
(2) The sexual dangerousness screening shall be reviewed at least every three years by the board and the State Department of State Hospitals, and updated as appropriate to reflect current research on sexually violent predators and risk assessments for people convicted of sex offenses.
SECTION 1.SEC. 2.
Section 3055 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
3055.
(a) The Elderly Parole Program is hereby established, to be administered by the Board of Parole Hearings, for purposes of reviewing the parole suitability of any inmate incarcerated person who is 50 years of age or older and has served a minimum of 20 years of continuous incarceration on the inmate’s their current sentence, serving either a determinate or indeterminate sentence.
(b) (1) For purposes of this code, the term “elderly parole eligible date” means the date on which an inmate incarcerated person who qualifies as an elderly offender is eligible for release from prison.
(2) For purposes of this section, “incarceration” means detention in a city or county jail, local juvenile facility, a mental health facility, a Division of Juvenile Justice facility, or a Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation facility.
(c) When considering the release of an inmate
incarcerated person specified by subdivision (a) pursuant to Section 3041, the board shall give special consideration to whether age, time served, and diminished physical condition, if any, have reduced the elderly inmate’s incarcerated person’s risk for future violence.
(d) When scheduling a parole consideration hearing date pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 3041.5 or when considering a request for an advance hearing pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 3041.5, the board shall consider whether the inmate
incarcerated person meets or will meet the criteria specified in subdivision (a).
(e) An individual who is subject to this section shall meet with the board pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 3041. If an inmate incarcerated person is found suitable for parole under the Elderly Parole Program, the board shall release the individual on parole as provided in Section 3041.
(f) If parole is not granted, the board shall set the time for a subsequent elderly parole hearing in accordance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 3041.5. No subsequent elderly parole hearing shall be necessary if the offender is released pursuant to other statutory provisions prior to the date of the subsequent hearing.
(g) This section does not apply to cases in which sentencing occurs pursuant to Section 1170.12, subdivisions (b) to (i), inclusive, of Section 667, or in cases which an individual was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole or death.
(h) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a person sentenced pursuant to Sections 269, 288.7, 667.61, and
667.71 shall not be suitable eligible for parole pursuant to this section unless the person is 65 years of age or older and has served a minimum of 25 years of
continuous incarceration on their current sentence.
(2) Effective January 1, 2027, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall recalculate Elderly Parole Eligible Dates for people designated in this subdivision. Effective January 1, 2027, the Board of Parole Hearings shall cancel parole hearings for people designated in this subdivision that were previously scheduled based solely on an Elderly Parole Eligible Date calculated using 50 years of age and 20 years of continuous incarceration, as described in subdivision (a).
(i) This section does not apply if the person was convicted of first-degree murder if the victim was a peace officer, as defined in Section 830.1, 830.2, 830.3, 830.31, 830.32, 830.33, 830.34, 830.35, 830.36, 830.37, 830.4, 830.5, 830.6, 830.10, 830.11, or 830.12, who was killed while engaged in the performance of their duties, and the individual knew, or reasonably should have known, that the victim was a peace officer engaged in the performance of their duties, or the victim was a peace officer or a former peace officer under any of the above-enumerated sections, and was intentionally killed in retaliation for the performance of their official duties.
(j) This section does not alter the rights of victims at parole hearings.
(k) By December 31, 2022, the board shall complete all elderly parole hearings for individuals who were sentenced to determinate or indeterminate terms and who, on the effective date of the bill that added this subdivision, are or will be entitled to have their parole suitability considered at an elderly parole hearing before January 1, 2023.
SEC. 3.
Section 5075.6 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
5075.6.
(a) Commissioners and deputy commissioners hearing matters concerning adults under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall have a broad background in criminal justice and an ability for appraisal of adult offenders, the crimes for which those persons are committed, and the evaluation of an individual’s progress toward reformation. Insofar as practicable, commissioners and deputy commissioners shall have a varied interest in adult correction work, public safety, and shall have experience or education in the fields of corrections, sociology, law, law enforcement, medicine, mental health, or education. In addition, insofar as practicable, commissioners and deputy commissioners may have professional or lived experience or educational background that may enhance the expertise of the parole board, including, but not limited to, the areas of social work, substance use disorder treatment, foster care, rehabilitation, community reentry, or the effects of trauma and poverty.
(b) All commissioners and deputy commissioners who conduct hearings for the purpose of considering the parole suitability of inmates, incarcerated persons, the setting of a parole release date for inmates, incarcerated persons, or the revocation of parole for adult parolees, shall, within 60 days of appointment and annually thereafter undergo a minimum of 40
48 hours of training in the following areas:
(1) Treatment and training programs provided to inmates incarcerated persons at Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation institutions, including, but not limited to, educational, vocational, mental health, medical, substance abuse, psychotherapeutic counseling, and sex offender treatment programs.
(2) Parole services.
(3) Commissioner duties and responsibilities.
(4) Knowledge of laws and regulations applicable to conducting parole hearings, including the rights of victims,
witnesses, and inmates. incarcerated persons.
(5) Sex offender behaviors, risks, and treatment considerations, to be provided by the State Department of State Hospitals.
SEC. 4.
Section 6600 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
6600.
As used in this article, the following terms have the following meanings:
(a) (1) “Sexually violent predator” means a person who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense against one or more victims and who has a diagnosed mental disorder that makes the person a danger to the health and safety of others in that it is likely that he or she they will engage in sexually violent criminal behavior.
(2) For purposes of this subdivision any of the following shall be considered a conviction for a sexually violent offense:
(A) A prior or current conviction that resulted in a determinate or indeterminate prison sentence for an offense described in subdivision (b).
(B) A conviction for an offense described in subdivision (b) that was committed prior to July 1, 1977, and that resulted in an indeterminate prison sentence.
(C) A prior conviction in another jurisdiction for an offense that includes all of the elements of an offense described in subdivision (b).
(D) A conviction for an offense under a predecessor statute that includes all of the elements of an offense described in subdivision (b).
(E) A prior conviction for which the inmate
incarcerated person received a grant of probation for an offense described in subdivision (b).
(F) A prior finding of not guilty by reason of insanity for an offense described in subdivision (b).
(G) A conviction resulting in a finding that the person was a mentally disordered sex offender.
(H) A prior conviction for an offense described in subdivision (b) for which the person was committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant to Section 1731.5.
(3) Conviction of one or more of the crimes enumerated in this section shall constitute evidence that may support a court or jury determination that a person is a sexually violent predator, but shall not be the sole basis for the determination. The existence of any prior convictions may be shown with documentary evidence. The details underlying the commission of an offense that led to a prior conviction, including a predatory relationship with the victim, may be shown by documentary evidence, including, but not limited to, preliminary hearing transcripts, trial transcripts, probation and sentencing reports, and evaluations by the State Department of State Hospitals. Jurors shall be admonished that they may not find a person a sexually violent predator based on prior offenses absent relevant evidence of a currently diagnosed mental disorder that makes the person a danger to the health and safety of others in that it is likely that he or she
they will engage in sexually violent criminal behavior.
(4) The provisions of this section shall apply to any person against whom proceedings were initiated for commitment as a sexually violent predator on or after January 1, 1996.
(b) “Sexually violent offense” means the following acts when committed by force, violence, duress, menace, fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim or another person, or threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or any other person, and that are committed on, before, or after the effective date of this article and result in a conviction or a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity, as defined in subdivision (a): a felony violation of Section 261, 262, 264.1, 269, 286, 287, 288, 288.5, or 289 of, or former Section 288a of, the Penal Code, or any felony violation of Section 207, 209, or 220 of the Penal Code, committed with the intent to commit a violation of Section 261, 262, 264.1, 286, 287, 288, or 289 of, or former Section 288a of, the Penal Code.
(c) “Diagnosed mental disorder” includes a congenital or acquired condition affecting the emotional or volitional capacity that predisposes the person to the commission of criminal sexual acts in a degree constituting the person a menace to the health and safety of others.
(d) “Danger to the health and safety of others” does not require proof of a recent overt act while the offender is in custody.
(e) “Predatory” means an act is directed toward a stranger, a person of casual acquaintance with whom no substantial relationship exists, or an individual with whom a relationship has been established or promoted for the primary purpose of victimization.
(f) “Recent overt act” means any criminal act that manifests a likelihood that the actor may engage in sexually violent predatory criminal behavior.
(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and for purposes of this section, a prior juvenile adjudication of a sexually violent offense may constitute a prior conviction for which the person received a determinate term if all of the following apply:
(1) The juvenile was 16 years of age or older at the time he or
she they committed the prior offense.
(2) The prior offense is a sexually violent offense as specified in subdivision (b).
(3) The juvenile was adjudged a ward of the juvenile court within the meaning of Section 602 because of the person’s commission of the offense giving rise to the juvenile court adjudication.
(4) The juvenile was committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for the sexually violent offense.
(h) A minor adjudged a ward of the court for commission of an offense that is defined as a sexually violent offense shall be entitled to specific treatment as a sexual offender. The failure of a minor to receive that treatment shall not constitute a defense or bar to a determination that any person is a sexually violent predator within the meaning of this article.
SEC. 2.SEC. 5.
Section 6601 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
6601.
(a) (1) (A) When the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings determines that an individual who is in custody under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, who is either serving a determinate or indeterminate prison sentence or whose parole has been revoked, and who is not in custody for the commission of a new offense committed while the individual was serving an indeterminate term in a state hospital as a sexually violent
predator, may be a sexually violent predator, the secretary or the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings shall, at least six months prior to that individual’s scheduled date for release from prison, refer the person for evaluation in accordance with this section. However, if the inmate section at least six months prior that individual’s release date or upon grant of parole, whichever occurs first. However, if the incarcerated person was received by the department with less than nine months of their sentence to serve, if the inmate’s
incarcerated person’s release date is modified by judicial or administrative action, if the inmate’s incarcerated person’s scheduled release date is less than four months after the decision to grant parole is made, or if the incarcerated person will be scheduled for a parole hearing in the next six months, the secretary or the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings may refer the person for evaluation in accordance with this section at a date that is less than six months prior to the inmate’s
incarcerated person’s scheduled release date.
(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C) and consistent with subdivision (d) of section 3053.9 of the Penal Code, when an incarcerated person whose sexual dangerousness screening, conducted pursuant to Section 3053.9 of the Penal Code, indicates they may qualify as a sexually violent predator is granted parole, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or the executive officer of the Board of Parole Hearings shall immediately refer the person for evaluation as described in this section.
(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B), a referral for evaluation of an incarcerated person whose sexual dangerousness screening, conducted pursuant to Section 3053.9 of the Penal Code, indicates they may qualify as a sexually violent predator is granted parole may be waived by the mutual agreement of the State Department of State Hospitals and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, if the incarcerated person is permanently medically incapacitated as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 1172.2 of the Penal Code.
(2) When an individual is in custody under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for the commission of a new offense committed while the individual was serving an indeterminate term in a state hospital as a sexually violent predator, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall, at least six months prior to the individual’s scheduled date for
release from prison, refer the person directly to the State Department of State Hospitals for a full evaluation of whether the person still meets the criteria in Section 6600. However, if the inmate incarcerated person was received by the department with less than nine months of their sentence to serve, or if the inmate’s incarcerated person’s release date is modified by judicial or administrative action, the secretary may refer the person for evaluation in accordance with this section at a date that is less than six months prior to the inmate’s
incarcerated person’s scheduled release date. The evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with subdivisions (c) to (g), inclusive. If both evaluators concur that the person has a diagnosed mental disorder so that the person is likely to engage in acts of sexual violence without appropriate treatment and custody, the Director of State Hospitals shall forward a request for a court order no less than 20 calendar days prior to the scheduled release date of the person to the county designated in subdivision (i) authorizing a transfer of the individual from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to the State Department of State Hospitals to continue serving the remainder of the individual’s original indeterminate commitment as a sexually violent predator if the original petition has not been dismissed. If the petition has previously been dismissed, the
Director of State Hospitals shall forward a request for a new petition to be filed for commitment to the county designated in subdivision (i) no less than 20 calendar days prior to the scheduled release date of the person consistent with subdivision (d).
(3) A petition may be filed under this section if the individual was in custody pursuant to a prison term, parole revocation term, or a hold placed pursuant to Section 6601.3, at the time the petition is filed. A petition shall not be dismissed on the basis of a later judicial or administrative determination that the individual’s custody was unlawful, if the unlawful custody was the result of a good faith mistake of fact or law. This paragraph applies to any petition filed on or after January 1, 1996.
(4) Paragraphs (1) and (3) of this subdivision shall apply retroactively to any individual in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on January 1, 2027, regardless of the date the individual’s sentence was imposed or the date the underlying offense was committed.
(b) The person shall be screened by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Board of Parole Hearings based on whether the person has committed a sexually violent predatory offense and on a review of the person’s social, criminal, and institutional history. This screening shall be conducted in accordance with a structured screening instrument developed and updated by the State Department of State Hospitals in consultation with the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. If as a result of this screening it is determined that the person is likely to be a sexually violent predator, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall refer the person to the State Department of State Hospitals for a full evaluation of whether the person meets the criteria in Section 6600.
(c) The State Department of State Hospitals shall evaluate the person in accordance with a standardized assessment protocol, developed and updated by the State Department of State Hospitals, to determine whether the person is a sexually violent predator as defined in this article. The standardized assessment protocol shall require assessment of diagnosable mental disorders, as well as various factors known to be associated with the risk of reoffense among sex offenders. Risk factors to be considered shall include criminal and psychosexual history, type, degree, and duration of sexual deviance, and severity of mental disorder.
(d) Pursuant to subdivision (c), the person shall be evaluated by two practicing psychiatrists or psychologists, or one practicing psychiatrist and one practicing psychologist, designated by the Director of State Hospitals. If both evaluators concur that the person has a diagnosed mental disorder so that the person is likely to engage in acts of sexual violence without appropriate treatment and custody, the Director of State Hospitals shall forward a request for a petition for commitment under Section 6602 to the county designated in subdivision (i). Copies of the evaluation reports and any other supporting documents shall be made available to the attorney designated by the county pursuant to subdivision (i) who may file a petition for commitment.
(e) If one of the professionals performing the evaluation pursuant to subdivision (d) does not concur that the person meets the criteria specified in subdivision (d), but the other professional concludes that the person meets those criteria, the Director of State Hospitals shall arrange for further examination of the person by two independent professionals selected in accordance with subdivision (g).
(f) If an examination by independent professionals pursuant to subdivision (e) is conducted, a petition to request commitment under this article shall only be filed if both independent professionals who evaluate the person pursuant to subdivision (e) concur that the person meets the criteria for commitment specified in subdivision (d). The professionals selected to evaluate the person pursuant to subdivision (g) shall inform the person that the purpose of their examination is not treatment but to determine if the person meets certain criteria to be involuntarily committed pursuant to this article. It is not required that the person appreciate or understand that information.
(g) An independent professional who is designated by the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or the Director of State Hospitals for purposes of this section shall not be a state government employee, shall have at least five years of experience in the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, and shall include psychiatrists and licensed psychologists who have a doctoral degree in psychology. The requirements set forth in this section also shall apply to professionals appointed by the court to evaluate the person for purposes of any other proceedings under this article.
(h) (1) If the State Department of State Hospitals determines that the person is a sexually violent predator as defined in this article, the Director of State Hospitals shall forward a request for a petition to be filed for commitment under this article to the county designated in subdivision (i) no less than 20 calendar days prior to the release of the person. Copies of the evaluation reports and any other supporting documents shall be made available to the attorney designated by the county pursuant to subdivision (i) who may file a petition for commitment in the superior court.
(2) If a hold is placed pursuant to Section 6601.3 and the State Department of State Hospitals determines that the person is a sexually violent predator as defined in this article, the Director of State Hospitals shall forward a request for a petition to be filed for commitment under this article to the county designated in subdivision (i) no less than 20 calendar days prior to the end of the hold.
(3) The person shall have no right to enforce the time limit set forth in this subdivision and shall have no remedy for its violation.
(i) If the county’s designated counsel concurs with the recommendation, a petition for commitment shall be filed in the superior court of the county in which the person was convicted of the offense for which the person was committed to the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The petition shall be filed, and the proceedings shall be handled, by either the district attorney or the county counsel of that county. A person’s subsequent conviction for an offense that is not a sexually violent offense committed while in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or the State Department of State Hospitals that occurs prior to the resolution of a petition filed pursuant to this section shall not change jurisdiction for the petition from the county in which the person was convicted of the offense for which the person was committed to the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. If a person is convicted of a subsequent sexually violent offense committed while in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or the State Department of State Hospitals that occurs prior to the resolution of a petition filed pursuant to this section a subsequent petition for commitment as a sexually violent predator pursuant to this section shall be filed in the superior court of the county in which the person was convicted of the subsequent sexually violent offense. The county board of supervisors shall designate either the district attorney or the county counsel to assume responsibility for proceedings under this article.
(j) An order issued by a judge pursuant to Section 6601.5, finding that the petition, on its face, supports a finding of probable cause to believe that the individual named in the petition is likely to engage in sexually violent predatory criminal behavior upon release, shall toll that person’s parole pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 3000 of the Penal Code, if that individual is determined to be a sexually violent predator.
(k) The attorney designated by the county pursuant to subdivision (i) shall notify the State Department of State Hospitals of its decision regarding the filing of a petition for commitment pursuant to subdivision (d) within 15 days of making that decision.
SEC. 6.
Section 6601.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
6601.3.
(a) Upon a showing of good cause, the Board of Parole Hearings may order that a person referred to the State Department of State Hospitals pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 6601 remain in custody for no more than 45 days beyond the person’s scheduled release date for full evaluation pursuant to subdivisions (c) to (i), inclusive, of Section 6601.
(b) Upon a showing of good cause, the Board of Parole Hearings may order that a person referred to the State Department of State Hospitals pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 6601 remain in custody for no more than 180 days beyond the person’s scheduled release date for full evaluation pursuant to subdivisions (c) to (i), inclusive, of Section 6601.
(c) For purposes of this section, the purposes of subdivision (a), good cause means circumstances where there is a recalculation of credits or a restoration of denied or lost credits by any custodial agency or court, a resentencing by a court, the receipt of the prisoner into custody, or equivalent exigent circumstances that result in there being less than 45 days prior to the person’s
scheduled release date for the full evaluation described in subdivisions (c) to (i), inclusive, of Section 6601.
(d) For the purposes of subdivision (b), good cause means circumstances where there are less than 180 days prior to the person’s scheduled release date for the full evaluation described in subdivisions (c) to (i), inclusive, of Section 6601.
SEC. 3.SEC. 7.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.